Difference between revisions of "Establishing Good Working Conditions"
(→The three fundamental rules) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Trust, transparency and the right to disagreement== | ==Trust, transparency and the right to disagreement== | ||
− | Trust is important because people should feel safe, especially in heterogeneous groups in which the feeling of uncertainty among participants and facilitators is normal and common. Transparency gives orientation. Only those individuals who have all the relevant information can participate in an optimal way. And for sure democratic learning environments give participants and facilitators the right to disagree with positions or statements. | + | Trust is important because people should feel safe, especially in heterogeneous groups in which the feeling of uncertainty among participants and facilitators is normal and common. Transparency gives orientation. Only those individuals who have all the relevant information can participate in an optimal way. And for sure democratic learning environments give participants and facilitators the right to disagree with positions or statements. What else is helping your participants to feel safe to open twoard each other and toward the leanring process? |
<div class=teaser-box> | <div class=teaser-box> | ||
===[[Three basic rules]]=== | ===[[Three basic rules]]=== | ||
− | + | We provide a STOP, discretion and disagreement rule as basic agreements on the working style. | |
</div> | </div> | ||
− | |||
<div class=teaser-box> | <div class=teaser-box> | ||
− | === [[ | + | === [[Code of Conduct]]=== |
− | + | 2[[File:Icône Ile.svg | 100px | left]]A seminar is an island and we imagine ourselves to be stranded on this island. Now we have to find our own rules. | |
</div> | </div> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<div class=teaser-box> | <div class=teaser-box> | ||
− | + | === [[Methods for Trustbuilding]]=== | |
− | === [[ | + | Some methods mostly including body contact help to build relations among participants. |
− | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 78: | Line 66: | ||
* [[Establishing good working conditions]] | * [[Establishing good working conditions]] | ||
− | ** [[ | + | ** [[Three basic rules]] |
− | ** | + | **[[Code of Conduct]] |
− | ** | + | **[[Methods for Trustbuilding]] |
− | ** | + | **[[Name Games]] |
− | ** | + | **[[First Evening]] |
− | ** | + | **[[Games for Getting to Know Each Other]] |
− | ** | + | **[[Creative Hunting]] |
− | + | **[[Values in the Teamwork]] | |
+ | |||
<hr style="border:0; border-bottom: 1px dashed #d21e3d; width: 100%;"> | <hr style="border:0; border-bottom: 1px dashed #d21e3d; width: 100%;"> | ||
Revision as of 12:47, 8 November 2016
Contents
Trust, transparency and the right to disagreement
Trust is important because people should feel safe, especially in heterogeneous groups in which the feeling of uncertainty among participants and facilitators is normal and common. Transparency gives orientation. Only those individuals who have all the relevant information can participate in an optimal way. And for sure democratic learning environments give participants and facilitators the right to disagree with positions or statements. What else is helping your participants to feel safe to open twoard each other and toward the leanring process?
Name games and getting to know each other
You’ve already learned a lot about your participants through working with their needs and discussing the basic working principles with them. It is essential to a good working atmosphere that you as a trainer and the participants know everyone’s names and the right pronunciation. The deeper sense behind name games is that learners may interconnect independently of the teacher, that they build trust which is a precondition for deeper experiential learning later.