|
|
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | <div class=left-column-contentinner>
| + | <div class=teaser-text>One aim of this cheklist is to help you to give an overview about a seminar for persons, that were not at the seminar, especially clients. As well it helps a team to structure their evaluation process and helps to save findings, outcomes or aspects that have to be kept in mind for the future. Keep the report short, but understandable! Always think of, what the concrete target groups (internal or public?) really need to know. |
− | <div class=teaser-text>One aim of this cheklist is to help you to give an overview about a seminar for persons, that were not at the seminar, especially clients. As well it helps a team to structure their evaluation process and helps to save findings, outcomes or aspects that have to be kept in mind for the future. Keep the report short, but understandable! Always think of, what the concrete target groups of a report really need to know. | |
| </div> | | </div> |
− | | + | <div class=methodpage-content> |
| ==Organization== | | ==Organization== |
| <table> | | <table> |
| <tr> | | <tr> |
| <td> | | <td> |
− | ===1. Accommodation=== | + | ===1. Facility and accommodation=== |
| * Surrounding of the Hotel (journey to Hotel, location, opportunities outside the Hotel) | | * Surrounding of the Hotel (journey to Hotel, location, opportunities outside the Hotel) |
| *Conditions of the hotel (price-quality ratio) | | *Conditions of the hotel (price-quality ratio) |
Line 60: |
Line 59: |
| * Which competences were acquired/improved by participants in your project? | | * Which competences were acquired/improved by participants in your project? |
| * Were these in line with what you had planned? If not, please explain. | | * Were these in line with what you had planned? If not, please explain. |
− | * Competences are in example
| + | * Describe the wider outcome or impact of the training or workshop. |
− | **(Self-)reflection on own behavior and activities, on strengths and areas for development;
| |
− | **Intercultural competences;
| |
− | **Application of innovative methods and tools;
| |
− | **Understanding importance of reflection & evaluation; democratic values;
| |
− | * Describe the wider impact of the project at local, regional, national, European and/or international levels. | |
− | **Regional level: development of local communities, better understanding of European context;
| |
− | **European level: higher quality of democratic citizenship education, spread of innovative methods across Europe, debate about value based active citizenship
| |
− | **International level: cross-boarder sustainable network to exchange best practices, innovations in non-formal work as active citizens
| |
| </td> | | </td> |
| </tr> | | </tr> |
Line 102: |
Line 93: |
| <tr> | | <tr> |
| <td> | | <td> |
− | ===1. Group dynamics=== | + | ===1. Group characteristics=== |
− | * Quality of the group (experience, knowledge, expectations, motivation, attitudes, heterogeneity etc.) | + | * Social characteristics: heterogeneity, diversity, relevant criteria |
− | *Development of the group during the program year (only practice and reflection seminar) | + | * Attitude(s) regards the learning process: motivation, expectation, active participation... |
− | *Challenges | + | *Resources: experience, knowledge (i. e. experts among participants) |
| + | |
| + | ===2. Group Dynamics=== |
| + | *Development of the group |
| + | *Solidarity among and support of each other. |
| + | *..and of the common learning process |
| </td> | | </td> |
| </tr> | | </tr> |
Line 111: |
Line 107: |
| <br> | | <br> |
| <hr style="border: 1px solid #d21e3d; width: 90%;"> | | <hr style="border: 1px solid #d21e3d; width: 90%;"> |
| + | |
| ==Evaluation== | | ==Evaluation== |
| <table> | | <table> |
Line 123: |
Line 120: |
| ===2. Evaluation by the Participants=== | | ===2. Evaluation by the Participants=== |
| * Quantitative (questionnaires, thermometers etc.) | | * Quantitative (questionnaires, thermometers etc.) |
− | * Qualitative (open rounds, individual feedbacks etc) | + | * Assessment of data accessed by qualitative methods (open rounds, individual feedbacks etc) |
| </td> | | </td> |
| </tr> | | </tr> |
| </table> | | </table> |
− | <br>
| + | |
− | <hr style="border: 1px solid #d21e3d; width: 90%;">
| |
| ==Recommendations for the Future== | | ==Recommendations for the Future== |
| <table> | | <table> |
Line 141: |
Line 137: |
| *MitOst/Theodor-Heuss-Kolleg | | *MitOst/Theodor-Heuss-Kolleg |
| </div> | | </div> |
− | <div class=right-column-contentinner> | + | <div class=methodpage-infos> |
− | ===Category=== | + | <hr class=simpleline> |
| + | ===Related:=== |
| *[[Documentation in Trainings]] | | *[[Documentation in Trainings]] |
| + | <hr class=simpleline> |
| + | </div> |
| + | __NOTOC__ |