|
|
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | <div class=teaser-text>With this method you can determine in a group which subjects you want to deal with and which project goal is for you crucial. </div> | + | <div class=teaser-text>Slice a complex issue into several pieces and decide how much resources you want to dedicate to each piece. This method might be useful for groups and individual work.</div> |
| <div class=methodpage-infos> | | <div class=methodpage-infos> |
| <hr class=simpleline> | | <hr class=simpleline> |
Line 7: |
Line 7: |
| | | |
| [[File:Group-size.png | 20px | Group Size ]] 5-25 people | | [[File:Group-size.png | 20px | Group Size ]] 5-25 people |
− |
| |
− | [[File:Created-by.png | | 20px |Created By ]] H. Fahrun
| |
| | | |
| [[File:Keywords.png | 20px | Keywords ]] evaluation, decisionmaking | | [[File:Keywords.png | 20px | Keywords ]] evaluation, decisionmaking |
Line 21: |
Line 19: |
| <div class=methodpage-content> | | <div class=methodpage-content> |
| [[File:Evaluation entscheidungstorte.jpg | 400px|thumb| right| Illustration of the decision cake]] | | [[File:Evaluation entscheidungstorte.jpg | 400px|thumb| right| Illustration of the decision cake]] |
| + | This method can be used in very different contexts. You can determine in a group which subjects you want to deal with and which project goal is for you crucial. Or you can identify the most important aspects of further planning in a team. Also during evaluation this analysis might be helpful. How much awareness or resources did you spent for which aspects represented by the single pieces of cake? How does this relate to your plans? In a classical group evaluation you could gather what you liked in the subject of a training, which organizational or regarding the contents aspects of the project were most interesting. |
| | | |
− | Or you can identify the most important aspects of further planning in the team.
| + | ==Description== |
− | | + | As a first step, you gather all possible aspects, subjects, goals, area of responsibility. You number them. Afterwards begins an individual work. Each of you draws a circle or cuts it out of the cardboard. Now you divide the circle – like with the cake – into pieces of a cake: important aspects become a large piece of the cake, the less important the smaller. At the end, the pieces of each participant are compared, in order to find out the biggest (=the most important) of all. |
− | You can also gather what you like in the subject, which organizational or regarding the contents aspects of the project were most interesting.
| |
| | | |
− | ==When to use?== | + | <hr class=boldline> |
− | You can use this method at the beginning of the work period or the seminar, but at the end of the project as well.
| + | <noinclude>{{:Block: Author Heike Fahrun}}</noinclude> |
| | | |
− | ==Description==
| |
− | As a first step, you gather all possible aspects, subjects, goals, area of responsibility. You number them. Afterwards begins an individual work. Each of you draws a circle or cuts it out of the cardboard. Now you divide the circle – like with the cake – into pieces of a cake: important aspects become a large piece of the cake, the less important the smaller. At the end, the pieces of each participant are compared, in order to find out the biggest (=the most important) of all.
| |
| </div> | | </div> |
| __NOTOC__ | | __NOTOC__ |
| + | [[Category:Method]] |
| + | [[Category:Assessment]] |
Slice a complex issue into several pieces and decide how much resources you want to dedicate to each piece. This method might be useful for groups and individual work.
20 minutes
Standard
5-25 people
evaluation, decisionmaking
Related:
Illustration of the decision cake
This method can be used in very different contexts. You can determine in a group which subjects you want to deal with and which project goal is for you crucial. Or you can identify the most important aspects of further planning in a team. Also during evaluation this analysis might be helpful. How much awareness or resources did you spent for which aspects represented by the single pieces of cake? How does this relate to your plans? In a classical group evaluation you could gather what you liked in the subject of a training, which organizational or regarding the contents aspects of the project were most interesting.
Description
As a first step, you gather all possible aspects, subjects, goals, area of responsibility. You number them. Afterwards begins an individual work. Each of you draws a circle or cuts it out of the cardboard. Now you divide the circle – like with the cake – into pieces of a cake: important aspects become a large piece of the cake, the less important the smaller. At the end, the pieces of each participant are compared, in order to find out the biggest (=the most important) of all.
Heike Fahrun
Facilitator and educational expert since 2001, author of handbooks for facilitators. Focus: particuipation, civil engagement, diversity-cobnscious learning, rememberance, mentoring, train-the-trainer.