Difference between revisions of "Evaluation"
(→Topics) |
|||
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==Mixing methodologies for reflection== | ||
+ | Take care for a range of different ways to assess and interpret the needed data - the findings and evaluation from your participants. The principle of [[Method Mix| method mix]] is valid as well for evaluation. Offer your participants opportunities for self-reflection and feedback that | ||
+ | * covers head, heart and hand | ||
+ | * includes individual and group evaluation | ||
+ | * addresses different senses: writing, speaking, moving,... | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class=left-box> | ||
+ | '''Style''' | ||
+ | * Appropriate methods for your target group | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Confidentiality''': | ||
+ | * Anonymous, | ||
+ | * Half-public, | ||
+ | * Public | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Group Relation''' | ||
+ | * In a plenum, | ||
+ | * In other collaborative ways | ||
+ | * Individual work | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Way of Expression''' | ||
+ | * Individually speaking or dialogue | ||
+ | * Writing | ||
+ | * Walking like in sociographic methods | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <table><tr><td style="width: 25%;"> | ||
+ | '''Style''' | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td style="width: 25%;"> | ||
+ | '''Confidentiality''' | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td style="width: 25%;"> | ||
+ | '''Group Relation''' | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td style="width: 25%;"> | ||
+ | '''Way of Expression''' | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | * Appropriate methods for your target group | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | * Anonymous, | ||
+ | * Half-public, | ||
+ | * Public | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | * In a plenum, | ||
+ | * In other collaborative ways | ||
+ | * Individual work | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | * Individually speaking or dialogue | ||
+ | * Writing | ||
+ | * Walking like in sociographic methods | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Quantitative or qualitative?== | ||
+ | How deep should or needs your evaluation go? When you want to know how your participants feel, you ask them to show you “thumb up/down”. Afterwards you know that ten persons feel well and three of them not so well. Or you ask detailed qualitative questions, with which you find out why they feel themselves like that or what they need to feel better. You use a ''quantitative'' and a ''qualitative'' method – both of them are all right, when they suit the situation, they often complement each other. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Results in colour or...== | ||
+ | Choosing your method you should also consider the form, in which you need results. Language, pictures, photos… Many things are possible and they can complete a particular situation or also contrast it. It is important with most methods to formulate a question as concretely as possible. | ||
+ | |||
+ | As self-evaluation is crucial for independent learning, we include here as well methods, that help indicviduals to document learning outcomes, inspirations, insights in and individual way. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
<br> | <br> |
Revision as of 00:01, 5 January 2019
N. Zimmermann/ H. Fahrun
Contents
Focuses of reflection
Goal Achievement
|
Methodology
|
Content
|
Space/Context
|
Competency development
|
Management
|
Mixing methodologies for reflection
Take care for a range of different ways to assess and interpret the needed data - the findings and evaluation from your participants. The principle of method mix is valid as well for evaluation. Offer your participants opportunities for self-reflection and feedback that
- covers head, heart and hand
- includes individual and group evaluation
- addresses different senses: writing, speaking, moving,...
Style
- Appropriate methods for your target group
Confidentiality:
- Anonymous,
- Half-public,
- Public
Group Relation
- In a plenum,
- In other collaborative ways
- Individual work
Way of Expression
- Individually speaking or dialogue
- Writing
- Walking like in sociographic methods
Style |
Confidentiality |
Group Relation |
Way of Expression |
|
|
|
|
Quantitative or qualitative?
How deep should or needs your evaluation go? When you want to know how your participants feel, you ask them to show you “thumb up/down”. Afterwards you know that ten persons feel well and three of them not so well. Or you ask detailed qualitative questions, with which you find out why they feel themselves like that or what they need to feel better. You use a quantitative and a qualitative method – both of them are all right, when they suit the situation, they often complement each other.
Results in colour or...
Choosing your method you should also consider the form, in which you need results. Language, pictures, photos… Many things are possible and they can complete a particular situation or also contrast it. It is important with most methods to formulate a question as concretely as possible.
As self-evaluation is crucial for independent learning, we include here as well methods, that help indicviduals to document learning outcomes, inspirations, insights in and individual way.
Participative Evaluation of Learning
Reflecting Teamwork
- Evaluation
Example: Aquarium
A cooperative evaluation in a training. Each participant marks his or her fish. Near the surface means +, at the ground means -.