|
|
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 46: |
Line 46: |
| | <tr> | | <tr> |
| | <td> | | <td> |
| − | ===Logic==== | + | ===Logic=== |
| | The parts make sense together, there are no contradictions. | | The parts make sense together, there are no contradictions. |
| | </td> | | </td> |
| Line 52: |
Line 52: |
| | <tr> | | <tr> |
| | <td> | | <td> |
| | + | |
| | ===Fairness=== | | ===Fairness=== |
| | it is justifiable, and not self-serving or one-sided. | | it is justifiable, and not self-serving or one-sided. |
| Line 64: |
Line 65: |
| | </table> | | </table> |
| | | | |
| | + | <hr class=boldline> |
| | ==Reference== | | ==Reference== |
| − | *Foundation for Critical Thinking; Intellectual Standards [http://www.criticalthinking.org/] | + | *Foundation for Critical Thinking; Intellectual Standards https://www.criticalthinking.org/ |
| | * N. Zimmermann, E. Leondieva (Ed.): [[Handbooks for Facilitators | Creativity]]; Facilitator Handbook #4; MitOst Editions 2017 | | * N. Zimmermann, E. Leondieva (Ed.): [[Handbooks for Facilitators | Creativity]]; Facilitator Handbook #4; MitOst Editions 2017 |
| | | | |
Latest revision as of 14:33, 25 April 2022
A concept is a result of an ideation process. More precisely: It describes the preliminary outcome of thinking or a current state, because thinking – hopefully – will not stop. Viewing intellectual work in this way brings us closer to the idea of critical thinking. It is "the art of thinking about thinking with a view towards improving it."
Consistency of your Idea
The competence of critical thinking and reflection on its intellectual standards might give us a clue as to how consistent a presentation, an insight or a concept paper already are.
Use this checklist to see whether you have applied the standards inspired by Critical Thinking concepts sufficiently:
Clarity
It is understandable; the meaning can be grasped.
|
Accuracy
It is free from errors, mistakes or distortions.
|
Precision
It is exact to the necessary level of detail and specificity.
|
Relevance
It is pertinent or related to the matter at hand.
|
Depth
It contains complexities and multiple interrelationships.
|
Breadth
It encompasses multiple viewpoints.
|
Logic
The parts make sense together, there are no contradictions.
|
Fairness
it is justifiable, and not self-serving or one-sided.
|
Context
It is appropriate in the concrete environment where it will be applied.
|
Reference
Related::
Handbook
N. Zimmermann, E. Leondieva, M. Gawinek-Dagargulia
Creativity
Handbooks for Facilitators #4: Read more
