|
|
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | <div class="left-column-contentinner">
| |
| <div class=teaser-text>A concept is a result of an ideation process. More precisely: It describes the preliminary outcome of thinking or a current state, because thinking – hopefully – will not stop. Viewing intellectual work in this way brings us closer to the idea of critical thinking. It is "the art of thinking about thinking with a view towards improving it." | | <div class=teaser-text>A concept is a result of an ideation process. More precisely: It describes the preliminary outcome of thinking or a current state, because thinking – hopefully – will not stop. Viewing intellectual work in this way brings us closer to the idea of critical thinking. It is "the art of thinking about thinking with a view towards improving it." |
| </div> | | </div> |
| + | |
| + | <div class="methodpage-content"> |
| ==Consistency of your Idea== | | ==Consistency of your Idea== |
| The competence of critical thinking and reflection on its intellectual standards might give us a clue as to how consistent a presentation, an insight or a concept paper already are. | | The competence of critical thinking and reflection on its intellectual standards might give us a clue as to how consistent a presentation, an insight or a concept paper already are. |
Line 45: |
Line 46: |
| <tr> | | <tr> |
| <td> | | <td> |
− | ===Logic==== | + | ===Logic=== |
| The parts make sense together, there are no contradictions. | | The parts make sense together, there are no contradictions. |
| </td> | | </td> |
Line 51: |
Line 52: |
| <tr> | | <tr> |
| <td> | | <td> |
| + | |
| ===Fairness=== | | ===Fairness=== |
| it is justifiable, and not self-serving or one-sided. | | it is justifiable, and not self-serving or one-sided. |
Line 63: |
Line 65: |
| </table> | | </table> |
| | | |
| + | <hr class=boldline> |
| ==Reference== | | ==Reference== |
− | *Foundation for Critical Thinking; Intellectual Standards [http://www.criticalthinking.org/] | + | *Foundation for Critical Thinking; Intellectual Standards https://www.criticalthinking.org/ |
| * N. Zimmermann, E. Leondieva (Ed.): [[Handbooks for Facilitators | Creativity]]; Facilitator Handbook #4; MitOst Editions 2017 | | * N. Zimmermann, E. Leondieva (Ed.): [[Handbooks for Facilitators | Creativity]]; Facilitator Handbook #4; MitOst Editions 2017 |
| | | |
| </div> | | </div> |
| | | |
− | <div class="right-column-contentinner"> | + | <div class=methodpage-infos> |
− | | + | <hr class=simpleline> |
− | ===Categories=== | + | ===Related::=== |
| * [[Unleashing Creativity]] | | * [[Unleashing Creativity]] |
− |
| |
| <hr class=simpleline> | | <hr class=simpleline> |
| <div class=right-box> | | <div class=right-box> |
Line 89: |
Line 91: |
| | | |
| </div> | | </div> |
| + | __NOTOC__ |
A concept is a result of an ideation process. More precisely: It describes the preliminary outcome of thinking or a current state, because thinking – hopefully – will not stop. Viewing intellectual work in this way brings us closer to the idea of critical thinking. It is "the art of thinking about thinking with a view towards improving it."
Consistency of your Idea
The competence of critical thinking and reflection on its intellectual standards might give us a clue as to how consistent a presentation, an insight or a concept paper already are.
Use this checklist to see whether you have applied the standards inspired by Critical Thinking concepts sufficiently:
Clarity
It is understandable; the meaning can be grasped.
|
Accuracy
It is free from errors, mistakes or distortions.
|
Precision
It is exact to the necessary level of detail and specificity.
|
Relevance
It is pertinent or related to the matter at hand.
|
Depth
It contains complexities and multiple interrelationships.
|
Breadth
It encompasses multiple viewpoints.
|
Logic
The parts make sense together, there are no contradictions.
|
Fairness
it is justifiable, and not self-serving or one-sided.
|
Context
It is appropriate in the concrete environment where it will be applied.
|
Reference
Related::
Handbook
N. Zimmermann, E. Leondieva, M. Gawinek-Dagargulia
Creativity
Handbooks for Facilitators #4: Read more