From Competendo - Digital Toolbox
Revision as of 06:19, 2 May 2022 by Nils.zimmermann (talk | contribs) (From:)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Trainers and participants start the seminar with very different expectations. Therefore, it is needed for all involved persons to share at the beginning of the training their expectations. In this way, trainers and participants can agree upon certain things and disappointments can be avoided.

Time 45 minutes

Material Standard

Group Size ca. 20 people

Keywords expectations, cards, start




Also interesting:


The aim is to make expectations of participants and facilitators regarding content and cooperation transparent. This allows a need-focused planning of content, goal and methods.


1. Work on one's own: The participants are asked to note down their own expectations regarding the seminar as on cards (1-3 keywords only on each card). [10 minutes]

2. Plenum: The cards are read aloud and sticked on a poster, which can be prepared before. The participants have the possibility to comment them and put them one after another in an order concerning the topic. [35 to 45 minutes]

3. The trainer sums up the participants expectations and comments and adds the expectations of the trainers. [10 minutes]

4. Discussion and negotiation in the plenum. The aim is to reach a consensus in terms of the planning of the seminar. If necessary the program has to be adjusted to the needs of the participants.

What's relevant?


Show the aspects to what the learners should add their expectations. This clarification would allow them to give you more precise feedback. More: Planning


It is open how much the trainers should position themselves in this early stage of the seminar regarding different comments. When evaluating the seminar trainers and participants should fall back on the expectations to check in how far they have been fulfilled.

Variation: Expectation Box

Use instead of a plenum an expectation box: Participants do their cards inside anonymously. Then trainers might evaluate them later during their planning sessions. Or small groups of participants go through the cards and summarize the mentioned aspects.