Difference between revisions of "Checklist: Relation to Participants"

From Competendo - Digital Toolbox
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
<div class=methodpage-infos>
 
<div class=methodpage-infos>
<hr class=simpleline>
 
[[File:Created-by.png  | 20px | Created By ]] [[User:Nils.zimmermann | N. Zimmermann]]
 
 
<hr class=simpleline>
 
<hr class=simpleline>
 
===Related:===
 
===Related:===

Revision as of 00:42, 2 May 2022

When the boundaries between facilitator and participants become more fluid, this can present a challenge to modern facilitators. As low-hierarchical people we have easier access to the target group. And sharing the same values and vision of a participative and pluralistic civil society is a prerequisite for a trusting atmosphere where participants can open them to others.

Related:


Also interesting:


Our Handbooks Lcff.png

N.Zimmermann

Facilitation step-by-step

Learning companion for facilitators. A self- learning portfolio tool. Read more

On the other hand, situations continually crop up where facilitators must give orientation, act as a role model, or inspire with experience or expertise. In contrast to a participant, we must always be prepared to take on the full responsibility for the group process. Therefore we should take care to balance private passion and affection with the professional mission and the concrete goals of the training.

We often hear that younger facilitators especially enjoy the spirit of a group and become partially involved in the group's dynamics. On the one hand, this supports the idea of peer facilitation. On the other hand, too much involvement may influence your professionalism: your preparation may be lacking, your critical distance and evaluative competence may suffer, and sometimes you may become disoriented as to where you belong.

For non-peers, the question of the right balance between closeness to and distance from participants is also important. What if you do not represent the participants' group in terms of age or social background? To what extent do you then need to actively shape your relation to participants – where is distance the appropriate strategy in this case?


Closeness <- - - - - - - ->Distance

What kind of relation do you want to have to the participants on the continuum? Describe.

What should not happen?

How can you avoid it?



Facilitation step-by-step

Lcff.png

Learning companion for facilitators. A self- learning portfolio tool.