There is no Digital Didactics

From Competendo - Digital Toolbox
Jump to: navigation, search
“Digital didactics” - what a great term! Even the alliteration is beautiful. And more than that, it sounds like a conclusive answer to the many big questions that arise for lear-ning and teaching in the face of digital change. It is no wonder that digital didactics is in demand: journalists are looking for it, activists promise it and schools advertise with it. At second glance, however, one recognizes more doubts than certainties. And at third glance, talk of “digital didactics” is not only misleading, but also dangerous.

Is Digital Better?

Technology is neither good nor bad; nor is it neutral (Kranzberg, 1986). This can be applied to the didactic question. Learning or teaching does not become better or worse per se through the use of modern technology, but there is no doubt that digital technologies are changing learning and teaching. Certain characteristics of digital technologies fit particularly well with certain didactic directions – but not in any particular direction. A teaching-learning setting with digital materials, tools, and communication channels can have very different didactic directions.

At one extreme, technology enables teachers to exert a high degree of control and steer the learning process. (Here we imagine “teachers” as a combination of people and programmes). The learner follows a predetermined learning path, which in the ideal scenario is individually adapted for each person over the course of learning. Digital technology thus enables the implementation of behaviouristic didactics in pure form.

At the other extreme, the use of technology lies in the hands of the learner, who experiences quasi empowerment in the digital world: All means, materials and fellow learners are open to him. Learners do not follow a learning path – they design it themselves. It is therefore no wonder that constructivist representatives of the digital change see the greatest potential for learning as an active, self-directed, creative, social process.

Civic Education

Digital technology can optimize various forms of didactics and perhaps even make them possible in the first place. A homogenous digital didactic does not exist. The same digital technology can support very different didactics.

Ultimately, there is the fundamental political question of power that lies behind this concept: Who, teacher or learner, decides on the concrete use of digital media? Are learners subject to a process or do they have control over it? The question of digital didactics is a political question.

Old Didactics with Modern Media

The debate must not be based on technology, but on didactics! That sounds banal. But in everyday life, it is often the other way around – and talk of digital didactics promotes just that. One puts the digital at the beginning, not only linguistically. This obscures the fundamental questions, such as whether digital media are used to implement didactics oriented towards activation or didactics oriented towards control.

[...]

Terms such as „Germany‘s most modern school“ (self-designation of Schloss Neubeuern) are oriented towards technology, not didactics. Modern technologies do not make for a modern school. On the contrary, when things go badly, digitalisation optimises and cements old didactics.


J. Muuß-Meerholz: The Medium of the Penguin


Jöran Muuß-Meerholz

Joeran-muuss-merholz-cc-by-3-0-by-hannah-birr-j-und-k.png

Jöran Muuß-Meerholz holds a master in educational management. In 2009 Jöran started his agency J&K - Jöran und Konsorten to strengthen the connections between the educational and the digital world.

The article is a shortened and translated version of Es gibt keine digitale Didaktik!, originally published in German language under a CC-BY-License for http://pb21.de

Education and Learning

DIGIT-AL-education-and-learning.png

This text was published in the frame of the project DIGIT-AL - Digital Transformation Adult Learning for Active Citizenship.

Pirker, G. and Martínez, R. (Ed.): Education and Learning (2020). Part of the reader: Smart City, Smart Teaching: Understanding Digital Transformation in Teaching and Learning. DARE Blue Lines, Democracy and Human Rights Education in Europe, Brussels 2020.

Dare-network.jpg
Erasmusplus.jpg



References

Kranzberg, M. (1986). Technology and History: „Kranzberg‘s Laws“. Technology and Culture. 27 (3): 544–560. https://doi.org/10.2307/3105385



Related:


Also interesting:


DIGIT-AL Toolbox

DIGIT-AL.png

www.dttools.eu