Recognising and Identifying Learning

From Competendo - Digital Toolbox
Jump to: navigation, search
Validation.png
Knowledge skills and competences gained through non-formal and informal education needs to be recognized in the society. Or in other words: The learnt needs to be made visible for the learning person and its environment.

Learning Outcome

Statements of what a learner knows, understands and is able to do after completion of learning (Cedefop, 2009, p. 30)[1]. Learning outcome includes skills, knowledge and attitudes.

Unintended learning

Learning from experiences and activities that were not planned in advance. Social and non-formal learning processes offer rich opportunities for this.

Aspects that cannot be grasped properly as "outcome"

Food for thought, current feelings, thoughts, and states of mind...

The challenge here is that attitudes and processes initiated by democracy-related learning opportunities cannot simply be recorded as results. Furthermore, they cannot always be planned, or it is even part of the educational concept to offer space for unintentional learning and to reflect on this in the process. At the same time, it helps to recognize the skills and achievements of the participants when successes, results, and interim results become more visible.

Identifying and documenting therefore serves to explain what has been experienced and achieved, which is all the more important when it cannot be explained in the commonly used standardised forms (tests, grades...). This poses a particular challenge for learning opportunities that offer plenty of scope for developing transversal competences. These are not easy to grasp or always planable in advance, especially when learning goes beyond the acquisition of knowledge.

Therefore, it is very important for non-formal education to include reflection, awareness of the process nature of learning, and well-designed evaluation.

In particular civic engagement and volunteering are contributing to broad range of competences like the study and survey Job Bridge is showing. The most relevant competences in the opinion of volunteers are illustrated by the graphic below. However, the lack often recognition among learners and also among the society - for instance by fellow citizens, organizations, employers. In this sense, we as educators should spend some efforts in order to help learners to get their competencies recognized and also to show the social impact and value of Education for Democratic Citizenship and of civil engagement through our learners' recognition.

Most Relevant Competences Addressed through Volunteering

Engagement-competencies.JPG

Source: Job-Bridge, p. 20 [2]


Recognition & Validation

Recognition

Awareness and appreciation of competences:

Self-recognition

The basis of any recognition, including "personal awareness and assessment of learning outcomes, and the ability to use these learning outcomes in other fields"(YouthPass, n. d.)[3].

Social recognition

and political recognition are describing how others acknowledge and describe the competence of a learner.

Formal recognition

is describing and comparing learning, often in form of certificates, licenses, or similar, issued by a formal or non-formal educational institution.

The EU education policy context uses also the term validation for measures of formal recognition (Cedefop, 2009, p. 15)[4]:

Validation

  • The confirmation by a competent body
  • that learning outcomes have been identified and documented
  • assessed against predefined criteria
  • compliant with the requirements of a validation standard.
  • Validation typically leads to certification.

A social goal of competence description is recognition. Educators help learners with certificates and a rich evaluation methodology to proof their abilities so that others recognize them and also to support them in recognizing their competences by themself.

In non-formal education in particular, educational providers and educators do not work for an authority that certifies in a comparable way to formal learning providers. Consequently, they are not bound by validation standards. In the non-formal educational context, certificates of attendance, letters of recommendation and similar documents gain credibility through plausibility and the credibility of the certifying organisation.

In the absence of formally recognised certificates, it is necessary for individual learners to be able to demonstrate their competencies to others, so workshops and training sessions should focus on supporting self-reflection and self-recognition.

Attention needs also to be paid to a credible description on evidence base. The description of competence and learning outcome must go beyond formal grades in order to cover the broad aspects of competences. It should be helpful in the learners future and relevant for those third, whom learners need to proof their abilities and expertise.


Align to the Language of a Context

Depending on where the learner needs recognition, it is worth to take care about words and aspects that can be helpful. A lot of social contexts use specific language and have specific expectations toward the learning outcome. Conscious language and choice might give a description or certificate more value.

European Skills/Competences, Qualifications and Occupations (ESCO)

ESCO (European Skills, Competences, Qualifications and Occupations) offers a standardized terminology that includes skills, competences, qualifications and occupations. Its outcome for citizens and employees is to find the right terms for their formal and non-formal qualifications or for the job profiles they wish to develop. As well non-formal training provider may use the classifications for validation

Key Competences for Lifelong Learning and other Frameworks

A reference point in the EU context are the Key Competences for Lifelong Learning. For specific competence frameworks elaborated under this policy roof, consult the Competence Explorer.

Citizenship, Human Rights

The EU was not yet elaborating a framework for citizenship competences. The entrepreneurship competence framework EntreComp includes some aspects - like proactivity, initiative and collaboration. The European reference point is the Council of Europe's Reference Framework of Competences for Democratic Culture (RFCDC). Originally created for democracy-related learning in schools, it is more and more applied in non-formal and lifelong learning.

European Qualification Framework (EQR)

The European Qualification Framework (EQF) and the subordinated EU member state's national qualification frameworks seek to make the different national education systems more compatible and describe vocational profiles and educational outcome for a broad range of educational fields. The framework provides 8 levels of proficiency. The framework provides "benchmarks for qualification levels across Europe and encourage the embedding of validation systems with formal qualifications system" (Cedefop, 2009, p. 30)[5].

Other Competence-related Tools and Methods

Also other competence frameworks used in your organization or learning field can give orientation (like from OSCE, UNSECO, national curricula, or own frameworks).[6]





Assessment and recognition in formal and non-formal learning in entrepreneurship education

Assessment-E360.png

An introduction into competency-based assessment and evaluation not only for entrepreneurship education by the project EntreComp 360, by Hazel Israel (Bantani Education) with Svanborg Rannveig Jónsdóttir and Ramón Martínez.


E360.png


Inspiring Handbooks and Sources


Apps and Tools: Recognition, Assessment, Validation

References

  1. European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, 2009: The shift to learning outcomes Policies and practices in Europe; p. 30
  2. P. Boivin, J. Baez: Job Bridge – Stocktaking report on the state-of-play of validation in the voluntary sector across the EU; Lifelong Learning Platform; Brussels; October 2019;
  3. YouthPass: About Recognition
  4. European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, 2009: [www.cedefop.europa.eu/EN/Files/3054_en.pdf The shift to learning outcomes Policies and practices in Europe]
  5. European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) 2009: European guidelines for validating non‑formal and informal learning;
  6. Following the discussion of: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop): European guidelines for validating non‑formal and informal learning; p. 44